Search
Close this search box.

Securing Digital Banking Solutions with Multi-Factor Authentication

Kristen Bryce, Senior Product Marketing Manager

Alkami

Why Time-Based One-Time Passcodes (TOTP) Should Be Your Primary Choice in Online Banking Platforms
In honor of October being Cybersecurity Awareness Month, we’ve launched a blog series to keep you in the loop on the latest fraud threats impacting the banking industry and the technologies that can help safeguard your institution, digital banking solutions, and account holders. If you’re interested in learning how to deploy a layered approach to fraud prevention, visit our page here.

Protecting personal and financial information is a top priority for banks and credit unions, especially in digital banking solutions. This is crucial not only for safeguarding individual account holders and businesses but also for maintaining the reputation and trustworthiness of financial institutions. 

The increasing sophistication of cyber threats makes it imperative for banks and credit unions to implement layered security measures in their online banking platform. One effective way to enhance security is through multi-factor authentication (MFA), which requires users to provide multiple verification methods before accessing their accounts. By using MFA, financial institutions can significantly reduce the risk of unauthorized access and fraud, thereby protecting sensitive data and maintaining account holder trust. This blog explores various types of MFA, weighing the pros and cons of each.

Short Message-Based (SMS) OTPs

SMS-based one-time passcodes (OTPs) are a common MFA method where a unique, time-sensitive code is sent to a user’s mobile phone via text message. This additional layer of security ensures that only the person with access to the registered mobile number can complete the login process. Given their simplicity and widespread familiarity, SMS OTPs are a popular choice among digital banking solutions for verifying user identities.

  • Pros:
    • Ease of Use: SMS-based OTPs are convenient and widely familiar, requiring only a mobile phone to receive a text message.
    • Accessibility: They do not require internet access or additional apps, making them accessible for users with basic phones.
  • Cons:
    • Security Vulnerabilities: SMS can be intercepted or spoofed, making it less secure against sophisticated attacks like SIM swapping.
    • Dependence on Mobile Networks: Users may experience delays or lack of access in areas with poor signal reception.
Email-Based OTPs

Email-based OTPs involve sending a unique code to a user’s registered email address as part of the authentication process. This method requires users to enter the received code to verify their identity when accessing an account. It leverages the widespread use of email and provides an extra layer of security beyond just a password. This form of MFA is particularly useful for users who may not have access to a mobile phone or prefer not to use SMS.

  • Pros:
    • Simplicity: Similar to SMS OTPs, email-based OTPs are straightforward and easy to use.
    • Device Flexibility: They can be accessed from any device with internet access, providing flexibility.
  • Cons:
    • Email Account Security: The security of this method heavily relies on the user’s email account security. A compromised email can lead to unauthorized access.
    • Delays: Emails can sometimes take longer to arrive, causing inconvenience.
Authenticator Apps

Authenticator apps generate time-based one-time passcodes (TOTPs) that users must enter to verify their identity. These apps work by syncing with the user’s online account and providing a unique code that changes every 30 seconds. Because they do not rely on a network connection and offer a higher level of security, authenticator apps are increasingly popular among those seeking an advanced, offline-capable MFA solution.

  • Pros:
    • Enhanced Security: Authenticator apps generate TOTP that are more secure than SMS or email OTPs.
    • Offline Functionality: Unlike email or SMS-based MFA, they don’t rely on cloud-based services, ensuring your authentication method is always available, even without internet access.
  • Cons:
    • Setup Complexity: Initial setup requires scanning a QR code or entering a key, which can be complicated for some users.
    • Device Dependency: Losing access to the device with the authenticator app can lock users out, requiring recovery processes.
Biometric Authentication

Biometric authentication uses unique physical characteristics, such as fingerprints, facial recognition, or iris scans, to verify a user’s identity. This method leverages the distinct biological features of individuals, making it difficult for unauthorized persons to gain access. Biometrics provide a quick and user-friendly authentication experience, and their integration into modern devices makes them a convenient option for securing online banking accounts.

 

Biometric authentication allows users to log in to digital banking solutions with face ID, touch ID, or fingerprint.

 

  • Pros:
    • High Security: Biometrics are unique to each individual, making them highly secure.
    • Convenience: They offer a quick and seamless authentication experience without needing to remember passwords or codes.
  • Cons:
    • Privacy Concerns: Users may have concerns about the storage and use of their biometric data.
    • False Rejection: Issues like wet fingers or poor lighting can sometimes lead to failed authentication attempts.

 

Hardware Tokens

Hardware tokens are physical devices that generate a unique code or provide a means to authenticate a user’s identity. Examples include USB keys like YubiKeys or smart cards. Users must insert or connect the token to their device and sometimes enter a PIN to complete the authentication process. Hardware tokens offer a highly secure form of MFA, as they are immune to online threats like phishing and malware, requiring the physical presence of the device for access.

  • Pros:
    • Strong Security: Hardware tokens, such as YubiKeys, provide a physical layer of security, resistant to phishing and malware attacks.
    • No Internet Required: Unlike email or SMS-based MFA, they don’t rely on cloud-based services, ensuring your authentication method is always available, even without internet access.
  • Cons:
    • Inconvenience: Carrying a physical token can be cumbersome, and losing it can lead to access issues.
    • Cost: These tokens often come at an additional cost, which can be a barrier for some users.
    • Setup Complexity: Initial setup requires a multi-step process and attention to detail.

 

Soft Tokens

Soft tokens are software-based solutions that generate OTPs on a digital device, such as a smartphone, tablet, or computer. These tokens can be implemented through mobile or desktop digital banking solutions and function similarly to authenticator apps by generating time-based or event-based OTPs. They offer the convenience of being easily accessible on personal devices and do not require users to carry additional hardware.

  • Pros:
    • Convenience: Easily accessible on digital devices.
    • Cost-Effective: Typically free or low-cost, as they do not require physical hardware.
    • Flexibility: Can be quickly set up and used across multiple accounts or platforms.
  • Cons:
    • Device Dependency: Relies on the security and availability of the user’s digital device.
    • Vulnerability to Device Loss: If the device is lost or compromised, access can be disrupted.

 

Push Notifications

Push notifications for authentication involve sending a prompt to a user’s mobile device, asking them to approve or deny a login attempt. This method typically requires an app installed on the device that can receive these notifications. When a user attempts to log in, they receive an alert with details of the attempt, allowing them to quickly confirm or reject it. Push notifications are favored for their convenience and real-time nature, providing a seamless user experience while enhancing security.

  • Pros:
    • User-Friendly: Push notifications provide a seamless user experience, prompting users to approve or deny login attempts with a simple tap.
    • Immediate Response: They offer quick responses, notifying users of login attempts in real-time.
  • Cons:
    • Device Dependency: Users must have their mobile device with them and connected to the internet.
    • Potential for Overload: Frequent notifications can become a nuisance, especially if there are false alerts.

 

Enhancing Security with Digital Banking Solutions

While other methods like biometrics and hardware tokens offer excellent security, they often come with higher costs or require specific devices. For most financial institutions and users, TOTPs can likely provide the best balance of security and convenience. TOTPs are highly secure, immune to common attacks like SIM swapping or email compromise, and work offline, making them a strong and reliable option for protecting personal and financial information.

Push notifications also offer a user-friendly layer of security, providing real-time prompts for login approvals. They are particularly effective when used alongside TOTPs, as they allow users to quickly approve or deny account access attempts from their mobile devices, enhancing both convenience and protection.

As cyber threats continue to evolve, implementing TOTP and push notifications as part of a layered fraud protection strategy can significantly enhance the security of online banking platforms. This combination ensures that users’ sensitive information remains protected, reducing the risk of unauthorized access. Whether you’re a bank or credit union looking to strengthen security, adopting TOTPs and push notifications is a crucial step in today’s digital world.

Explore more ways to safeguard your digital banking experience with layered fraud prevention.
author avatar
Kristen Bryce
Kristen Bryce is the Senior Product Marketing Manager at Alkami with expertise in commercial banking, treasury management, and security and fraud protection.
Related Blogs

Never miss a beat in digital banking